<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Government of paper</title>
    <subTitle>the materiality of bureaucracy in urban pakistan</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Hull, Matthew S.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xxu</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">S.l.]</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>University of California Press</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2012</dateIssued>
    <edition>1st ed.</edition>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>320 p. ; 23 cm.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>In the electronic age, documents appear to have escaped their paper confinement. But we are still surrounded by flows of paper with enormous consequences. In the planned city of Islamabad, order and disorder are produced through the ceaseless inscription and circulation of millions of paper artifacts among bureaucrats, politicians, property owners, villagers, imams (prayer leaders), businessmen, and builders. What are the implications of such a thorough paper mediation of relationships among people, things, places, and purposes? Government of Paper explores this question in the routine yet unpredictable realm of the Pakistani urban bureaucracy, showing how the material forms of postcolonial bureaucratic documentation produce a distinctive political economy of paper that shapes how the city is constructed, regulated, and inhabited. Files, maps, petitions, and visiting cards constitute the enduring material infrastructure of more ephemeral classifications, laws, and institutional organizations. Matthew S. Hull develops a fresh approach to state governance as a material practice, explaining why writing practices designed during the colonial era to isolate the government from society have become a means of participation in it.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Matthew S. Hull.</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Bureaucracy</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>City planning</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Government paperwork</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Municipal government</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Pakistan</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Pakistan--Islāmābād</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Political science</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Public records</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">JS7093.A6</classification>
  <classification authority="ddc">352.38709549149 HUL 2012</classification>
  <identifier type="isbn">0520272153 (paperback)</identifier>
  <identifier type="isbn">9780520272156 (paperback)</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0520272153/chopaconline-20</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Amazon.com">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0520272153/chopaconline-20</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">0</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">131212</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20170105102926.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier>ASIN0520272153</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
