000 02462nam a22001817a 4500
003 NUST
005 20260207145030.0
082 _a621.382,LAT
100 _aLatif, Muhammad
_932948
245 _aStability Preserving Model Reduction Frameworks for Control of Complex Dynamical Systems /
_cMuhammad Latif
260 _aRawalpindi,
_bMCS (NUST),
_c2025
300 _axxi, 209 p
505 _aIn the domain of control systems engineering, mathematical modeling constitutes the cornerstone for the analysis of dynamical systems, particularly when systems become increasingly complex. However, the computational demands of simulating large-scale systems, incorporating various types of equations, present formidable challenges. Model reduction techniques aim to approximate complex, high-order systems with simpler, lower-order models while retaining acceptable accuracy. These techniques ultimately simplify the design, modeling, and simulation of large-scale systems. This dissertation delves into model reduction techniques tailored for large-scale highdimensional systems, leveraging balanced structures for improving efficiency. Initially, this research carries out literature review of existing model order reduction techniques in order to examine their limitations. Over the past few decades, numerous model order reduction methods have been proposed in the literature. Among these, the balanced truncation method is widely adopted due to its simplicity, ability to preserve stability in reduced models, and incorporation of a priori error bounds. The method involves balancing the original system and subsequently truncating the least controllable and observable states to derive reduced order models. However, in literature we find disadvantages of balanced truncation approach, because in few of the cases, it fails to guarantee the positive definiteness of associated Gramians, leading to potential instability in reduced models. To address this limitation, several alternate methods have also been proposed in the literature. However, these methods often impose restrictive conditions and may introduce significant approximation errors. Few of these, prove realization-dependent; while others increase computationally complexity, hindering their practical usage.
650 _aPhD Electrical Engineering Thesis
_9133107
651 _aPhD EE Thesis
_9133108
700 _aSupervised by Dr. Muhammad Imran
_9132697
942 _2ddc
_cTHE
999 _c616123
_d616123